@mcdonaldsuk Lousy Drive Thru Service&Poor Complaint resolution via Franchisees

I recently won two items on the monopoly stickers via Mcdonald's Monopoly promotion.One donut and one sundae.

I went to a London drive thru,paid for a double cheeseburger and medium fries for £2.58 and also ordered my free donut and sundae at the same time. The guy at the second window quite abruptly asked me for the two free monopoly tickets which I gave to him. I then collected my order at the third window and later on found that the donut was missing..

Now I can hear you saying,'Big deal so you lost out on one free donut, there are kids dying of starvation abroad get over yourself.' Well maybe I could let it go if this was the first time I had trouble at a Mcdonald's drive thru but it's not the first time I've had an incorrect order at this drive thru and aside from that I am a paying customer and I have spent a small fortune at this particular branch over many years so I decided to contact mcdonalds UK to hear their view.

The response from Mcdonald's Uk was to refer me to the franchisee who they mentioned by name,I then got a response from a personal email address from a lady who I can only assume works on his behalf:

This is a typical response you get from a blue chip company in the UK it is just lipservice,although the tone is nice and professional there is no effort to resolve the issue,the missing donut and inconvenience caused.I brought this up and got this:

So basically I got thanked for providing free of charge mystery shopper services and was offered 'a couple of monopoly stickers' I don't know exactly how many or whether there are any winners in this 'couple' but it's just a lazy response.At the very very least i would expect the offer of a donut and really there should be an offer of something for the inconvenience caused and for providing them with valuable feedback. Basically this has got to a stage where I've wasted a load of time on this and got nothing but empty lipservice.Well McDonald's can stick their stickers,their donuts and everything else they sell and I will take my custom elsewhere,at least KFC offer a 20percent discount on your next order with a survey completion referencing your last receipt.

Poor showing from one of the biggest names in the business world,it also highlights the fact that you are essentially dealing with a small business,each branch has a franchisee and customer service varies.

@SP_EnergyPeople Charging for Parking with no Warning @britishgas

Having used the lacklustre British Gas for years I have experience of the boiler care market. Despite British Gas's constant spamming and sales calls, dismissive customer service team & constant pressure to buy a new boiler they at least got one thing right,they never ever even thought of asking for parking charges when visiting the property.The same cannot be said of Scottish Power who in the very first visit quite inexplicably requested for parking money which has shocked me particularly seeing as they already have my bank details signed up to a £18 per month boiler care package which should see a nice profit for them long term because the boiler is in perfect working order.

I still haven't got this sorted with them but rest assured if they do not waive this parking issue I will be forced to look elsewhere. How can they expect to compete with British Gas? The parking charges levied on every single visit would exceed the policy! Typically these boiler engineers pop in for 10-20 minutes ,check a correctly functioning boiler then leave. Are they struggling so much financially as a firm that they need a couple of quid for parking?

Whether you think the parking charges are justified or not,they are not charged by competitors and are not mentioned in the application process which I went through with a fine toothcomb.

Also strange was the use of a subcontractor which smacks of a company that has poor coverage service wise.

So far I have one call basically the jist being they charge for parking 'so deal with it' and a response from the executive team that basically ignored the whole complaint and directed me to reschedule the initial appointment which never actually took place due to the parking issue.

Let's see if Scottish Power customer service can deal with this matter accordingly, I'm not holding my breathe judging by the experience so far.

@williamhill Beaurocracy , Frustrating Service but OK in the end

I placed a bet on NYI to win and Tavares to score.The bet was placed many hours before the start of the game:

It then came to my attention HOURS BEFORE THE GAME STARTED that John Tavares was out for the season with injury so I contacted Hills via Live Chat immediately.The guy on the other end was polite and well meaning but slow and had to run everything by his Supervisor. The operative asked me to send a link with proof of the injury ,I told him to Google it. After we both agreed Tavares was indeed injured, I waited about in hope that my stake would be rightfully returned (I shouldn't have to hope it's a straight forward case but you never know with Bookmakers these days). After he told me to wait again for 5-10 minutes he came back saying the bet would be voided and sent a link with Terms and Conditions which is a bookmakers' way of saying we're not bothered that you have a common sense issue that we can help you with as a valued customer but what we will do instead is point to some obscure Ts and Cs that allow us to mug you off and add your stake to our revenue figures for this month.

There are 3 major issues here which I have contacted CEO Phillip Bowcock with:

1) The lack of common sense and flexibility at local level.

2) The total disregard for a customers' experience in the face of profit and legalese.

3) The slowness of response and the onus on the customer to take the matter further to achieve justice.

I turned to Twitter to shed light on the situation and after some naming and shaming Hills did indeed return the the stake for this bet but it was a long,frustrating experience.

Hills gain credit for getting it right in the end and they deserve a back handed compliment,they are far from the worse bookmaker out there but the lesson is be weary with bookies and ensure that you get justice when you have a completely reasonable case.

@Fiat_uk @Ancaster_Group Very Bad Customer Service & Theft

Buying a new or a used car is a big purchase for most people and I've heard horror stories from many manufacturers. Fiat will come under the spotlight here,this occurred a few years ago but the matter was never resolved by Fiat and the passing of time has made the experience no less harrowing.

The purchase was an 'approved' 3 door Fiat Punto which cost in the region of £5000-£6000 including a part exchange. As you can imagine Fiat were very helpful as were the Ancaster Fiat network  until the cash was in their pockets and the car was off their forecourt. At point of sale Fiat made it clear that there was existing warranty on the vehicle and that was valid,well that wasn't strictly true because after the gearbox went after around  12,000 miles they didn't want to know!

Another side note to this was prior to the purchase a Ancaster Fiat dealer had offered £100 for the part exchange and looked surprised when this was rebuffed! Eventually a part exchange of £1000 was received from another Fiat dealer in the same Ancaster Group for the same vehicle,why that didn't ring alarm bells at the time I don't know but that should give you an idea of how unscrupulously this firm was and potentially is still operating a £900 swing on the same vehicle? I think the first dealer was having a laugh or was genuinely out to swindle a customer.

Obviously a decently made car should have a gearbox that gets through the warranty period at least,Fiat looked at the car and handed over a bill in the region of £1200. I left the car with them and said fix it under warranty or at least under the Sale of Goods Act,a gearbox going before warranty on a normally driven car is a sign of poor build quality and a car that wasn't fit for purpose at point of sale. There was an attempt to point to servicing from Fiat as a way to absolve themselves from responsibility as if servicing includes any checks whatsoever on the gearbox (servicing doesn't involve any checks on the gearbox at all).

Eventually Fiat sold the car,applying to DVLA for new registration ,effectively stealing it and as far as they were concerned that was the end of the matter. So Ancaster Group and Fiat felt it is ok to steal someone else's goods and absolve themselves from responsibility for a faulty product they have sold.

Also notable was the way Fiat Italy and Fiat UK pointed the finger at the Ancaster dealer while the Ancaster dealer pointed the finger back at the manufacturer,just an appalling customer service experience.

This is a cautionary tale for potential Fiat owners,the 'Fix it again Tomorrow' slogan hasn't arisen from nowhere,you may be better off buying Japanese if you want reliability and decent customer service!

Ancaster Group's way of dealing with an unsatisfied customer :

You have been warned!

Bookies' Banter is Better than their Customer Service? Priorities all Wrong

All the leading bookmakers  persist in bombarding the twittersphere with a host of bad sporting jokes,sporting trivia and general drivel while their customer service Twitter handle goes unmanned 70percent of the time with the last tweet dated as in and around October 2016 in most cases.

Most people will hear this and say ,'So what?' Well it's a little more serious than that,bookmakers are basically trying to come across as the amiable,friendly mate that you have a wager with over a pint in The Swan and Mitre but the reality is very different.The truth is you are placing wagers with an exploitative, ruthless,sociopathic corporate entity that intends to siphon profit off of ignorant or lazy punters who bet without adequate research,prudence or care while limiting the action or even banning shrewd punters who consistently turn a profit.

The bookies tweet out general jokey rubbish all day with seemingly no let up ,'United fans wish Pogba played half as well as a retired 36 year old  Gerrard has in this legends game!' accompanied by a picture of a United fan with his head in hands. Tripe like this is as uninteresting as it is innacurate.If a vital cog in United's midfield has been playing so poorly why is it that the bookies shorten them up to 1/5 (1.2) at every opportunity and if the game is at Old Trafford you'll be lucky to get that!Pogba hasnt been a world beater but 6th in the league and a League Cup medal suggests he isn't doing that badly!

Bookies need to put as much effort into their '@support' accounts as they do on their main accounts,don't fall for their laughs or engage in the bets they jokingly suggest or bring up,do your research,be selective and see these sharks for what they really are.

@Unibet abysmal Verification Process.Avoid!

My experience with Unibet went from the sublime to the ridiculous.

I got a £100 'bonus' from them having won a prize draw I was entered into for doing a customer experience survey for them. The bonus required wagering of £100 so I placed a bet on a hockey game for £100. About half an hour later after placing the bet I was informed the bet was being voided (while the team I bet on were leading 2 nil and went onto win the game). The market was up,I placed the bet and this inexplicable void came in,fishy I thought.I looked into it and the game was scheduled to start at 9.30am ,Unibet claimed my bet was struck at 9.30.19 Basically they were saying the game had started, alledgedly for 19 seconds, the puck may not have even been dropped by 9.30.19 but that was their argument despite the fact they had the market open,so who's fault is that I wonder?

So after that I wagered another bet for £100 which lost. Did I gt a second chance to void a bet like Unibet got with my initial bet? Of  course not but who cares? That's £100 in the pockets of Unibet so why would they care?

Luckily I went on to have a decent winning bet later on so I went to make a withdrawal. All of a sudden Unibet now wanted verification of my ID ! I had been depositing and withdrawing on this account for weeks before with no issue. Now all of a sudden I was a suspected money launderer or criminal underworld black market dirty cash kingpin. On Trustpilot I see others have had the same nonsense from Unibet with regards to verification they need to get their house in order.

The verification process is very frustrating,the arrogant customer service staff are clueless on live chat and are constantly changing the story with what documents are needed and how the pictures of documents should be taken. By the end of the picture taking process I could have given David Bailey a run for his money. If it wasn't for a half savvy guy called Jake on there I don't know what I would have done to get money which is rightfully mine!

I contacted the boss Henrik Tjarnstrom who ignores tweets and seemingly ignores emails as well which is disappointing and poor from Unibet.

Unlike 888sport the Unibet new customer offer is pretty lousy so don't even bother with that,just stay away unless you want grey hair before your time.

@WilliamHill : Fraudulent Bet Advertising

The bookmaker's hall of shame is filling up by the hour. How poor Estate Agents and Tax inspectors get a worse shake than Bookies is beyond me. I had a cheeky punt on the Ice hockey NHL.The terms of the bet are clear as day for a punter looking online. Cam Atkinson scores and Columbus Blue Jackets win and you get paid right?

Errr not exactly. Hills tried to point to some hidden Ts and Cs that state the bet is only valid upto 60mins,the winning goal was scored in Overtime. Well it would have been nice if this was written directly by the bet! 

Looking at the advertising online this can only be viewed as underhand by Hills and I'm disappointed because I actually viewed them as one of the good guys.

I also note how reluctant Hills and all bookies are to give out their CEO's details,they never know the name of the boss or his/her contact details which is as convenient for them as it is unprofessional.They get credit for a 0800 phoneline but lose this for the evasive way they gave details for complaint contacts and CEOs details.

Generally Hllls are ok,their website is ok,their service is ok,but on this occasion they have come up short.